Share
THIS QUARTER IN EDA
Time to read: 11:55             
Welcome back
EDA Elections
Community Action Plan

Transition Communities
Pesticides are killing bees and polluting our ecosystem
Climate change: why aren't we taking action now?

Colorado article
What is full cost accounting?

Back issues of EDA News can be found on the EDA website

Welcome back!
This is the Fall Edition of EDA News. We hope you had an enjoyable summer, despite the many climate-related crises in North America.
September signals the start of the last quarter of the year and virtually all sectors of our economy are busy. We're all back to a routine with more predictable schedules. Although you won’t see another EDA Newsletter until the end of the year, we’ll be working on several new projects, cultivating partnerships, engaging with donors, and preparing for more events. Please mark your calendars for the next two events, and watch for more information coming in the next few weeks.

  • October 21 EDA’s 7th Annual Conference
  • December 14 – Fireside Chat

EDA Elections
EDA will be holding an election September 18–24. Open to all Active Members, this is an opportunity for members to step up and help guide the organization as we work together towards a more equitable and sustainable world.
There are three positions open: Treasurer, Mediation Body Member, and At-Large Trustee. Terms of office are for three years and are staggered so that there are always experienced people on a team to help orient the new members.

Our strength is in our membership and that’s why we value the different life experiences, skills and perspectives that each of you brings to EDA. Elected positions offer members a rewarding experience to work together, learn new things and contribute to the growth of the organization.
The Call for Candidates went out on August 21st and ends on September 5th.  Active Members still have time to submit their applications. Here are the instructions on how to do that.
All Active Members of EDA are required to vote. We’re proud of the fact that in all our past elections, well over 60% of our members have voted. EDA was created in a way that accentuates our members’ direct involvement in the decisions of our organization. This policy reminds us that as a democratic organization we can elect the people that best represent the goals and values of the organization.

If you're an Active Member, take that step to join our management and help us grow the organization. And if you've been thinking of joining, this would be a great way way to jump in and demonstrate your support.

A new Community Action Plan

Your Education and Advocacy Teams have been working hard over the summer on a Community Action Plan that we hope to launch in October. It’s an exciting opportunity for all of us to take the work EDA has been doing out into our communities, to expand our reach and grow our numbers as we work together to bring us closer to a world of resource sufficiency for ourselves and those who come after us.


What does the plan look like?

Our Action Team has developed a series of short Power Points on topics that are integral to EDA’s work. They include Introduction to Economic Democracy Advocates (EDA); Economic and Resource Democracy; Carrying Capacity; Climate Change; Representative and Participatory Democracy; and Civics Education. These are our starting points. We’ll be adding other topics as we go along, depending on what our respective community members are interested in talking about, and your own interests.
The Power Points are accompanied by talking points that can be used as is, or adapted to our personal understanding of the topic, enriched by responses we receive from the group we’re speaking to. The talks are short, with numerous opportunities for discussion.
They are, in fact, an opportunity for us to have a conversation about important issues with people who live in the same area we do, for us to learn from them and for them to learn about EDA and the help we can offer them in bringing their needs and concerns to their elected officials.
Who will be doing these presentations?
Any and everyone.  Members, or even interested non-members of EDA.  People who want to get their community engaged in work that’s meaningful to them. These talks are designed to elicit a discussion, where we can learn from each other. This means we won’t present ourselves as experts, but as friends and neighbors who are interested in learning more about the issues so we can take action together.

How can I get involved?
We’ll be offering training for those who would like to learn more about this program, where we’ll take you through the entire process of identifying potential groups and organizations in your community. We’ll have materials you can use to make the initial contact, and help you prepare for your talk, and follow up. You don’t have to have any experience in public speaking, only a willingness to get out from behind your computer and engage with people in your community.

There’s power in numbers. Our ultimate goal is to bring about positive change through self-education and advocacy for legislative action. Contact the advocacy team for more information about how you can get involved.  We look forward to having you join us in this powerful program.


Transition Communities

Transition Network is an international movement of communities coming together to re-imagine and rebuild our world. Now active in 50 countries, the movement began in 2006 in a market town in the UK. People wanted to answer questions about what the world will look like as communities respond to the vast changes happening around them.

Transition Towns seek to make their communities more resilient and more inclusive. Projects begun by Transition groups include starting new enterprises, especially community-owned energy companies and food businesses, setting up buy local campaigns or working with local businesses in some other way. Some are developing local currency projects.

To succeed, local groups need a vision, community involvement, strong networks and partnerships. They also need inspirational, practical projects to initiate and support. Here are a couple of examples.
Media’s FreeStore, Pennsylvania
The FreeStore opened in 2014. People bring items they no longer need that would otherwise end up in landfill. Everything is free, and visitors can help themselves to anything in the shop. Watch a video on how this FreeStore has changed their community.

Transition Sarasota group in Florida
A common project for local groups is the practice of gleaning. This involves obtaining food items and provisions that would otherwise be wasted and donating them to people who need them. Volunteers with the local Transition Sarasota group in Florida regularly pick excess fruit from homeowners’ trees and donate it to local food banks.
They even have a registry for backyard fruit trees so that growers can have their extra fruit picked and donated with every harvest. Transition Sarasota also sponsors an Eat Local week each year and participates in events such as an Edible Gardening Festival with sustainable foods tasting.
Here are some of the movement’s founding principles, which closely match many of EDA's guiding principles:

  • Respect resource limits and create resilience - Reduce carbon dioxide emissions, and our reliance on fossil fuels so that we make wise use of precious resources

  • Promote inclusivity and social justice - To increase chances of all groups in society to live well, healthy and sustainable lives

  • Self-organization and decision making at the appropriate level – Working together with everyone at an appropriate, practical and empowering level

  • Attention to balance – Creating space for reflection and celebration to balance busy times and develop collaborative trusting relationships

  • Draw on each other’s experiences and insights - Freely sharing ideas and power, and developing a collaborative culture

  • Foster positive visioning and creativity – not being against things, but developing and promoting positive possibilities

Find out  more about the Transition Network and what you can do in your community.

Climate change: why aren’t we taking action now?
It’s complicated

Millions of Americans have been affected by a heat dome that gripped the southwest for weeks and spread to the southeastern states. Flooding in the northeast claimed lives and wiped out crops. Our neighbors to the north have had the worst wildfire season in Canadian history, burning an area the size of Alabama. And smoke from those wildfires has set records for poor air quality across the US.
Why isn’t everyone trembling in fear?
One reason: the climate crisis is a lower priority for Americans. As the 2024 election approaches, there are other issues on everyone’s mind such as the economy and healthcare costs. Results of a Yale University survey showed that:
  • Two-thirds of Americans are “somewhat worried
  • Thirty percent are “very worried
  • And two-thirds of Americans say they “rarely or never discuss the climate crisis with family or friends
But there's another reason
It’s the way humans experience fear. Brian Lickel, a social psychologist at  University of Massachusetts Amherst who researches human response to threats says that humans are not designed to remain in a high state of fear for long.

On a geologic time scale, climate change is happening rapidly, but from a human perspective, changes are happening relatively slowly. We tend to adapt to our stressors. We can either address the situation, or our reaction to the situation, so if we can’t immediately change things, we tend to ignore it. Many of us are in denial, but denial is difficult to do when your home has been washed away in a flood.

Allowing ourselves to feel the real-time effects of climate change is uncomfortable. How each one of us deals with despair is personal. It’s rooted in what kind of childhood and life experiences we’ve had, and the strategies we developed to deal with things.

Filmmaker Josh Appignanesi provides an example of how he handled his emotions around climate change. He turns the camera on himself as he outlines his journey from award-winning film maker who makes car commercials to climate activist. Take a moment and watch the trailer for his documentary.
What will you do?
If we sit back and accept that our world is doomed, we could all sink into despair. Thank heaven for the younger generation because their outrage, determination and activism sets an example and reminds us that acknowledging our feelings can propel us to action.

So, stop fretting and start doing. If you’re not a member of EDA – join us. If you’re not volunteering your skills and experience on one of the many EDA teams, you’re missing a chance to be part of the solution and deal with your own eco-anxiety.

Working together is an antidote to feelings of fear and helpless around climate change, and working together for solutions is what EDA is passionately focused on. Your voice matters.

Toxic insecticides are killing our bees

Bees contribute directly to a third of America’s food – from apples, peaches, lettuce, broccoli, cranberries, melons, tree nuts, strawberries and more, to grains such as alfalfa which feeds beef cattle.
We cannot live without bees. According to the United States Department of Agriculture, bees and butterflies help pollinate 75 percent of the world's flowering plants and roughly 35 percent o the world's food crops.

Neonicotinoids or Neonics

But the bees are dying, due to overuse of pesticides called neonicotinoids, or neonics. This downward spiral started when farms began to commercialize and shift to large monoculture operations. Large quantities of pesticides were used in an effort to increase output. They’re used on agricultural crops, lawns, gardens, golf courses and in flea the tick pet treatments.
Neonics permanently bind to the nerve cells of insects. Bees exposed to these pesticides will have uncontrollable shaking and twitching followed by paralysis before they die. Even a nonlethal dose can weaken critical functions such as their immune system, navigation, stamina, memory and fertility. These deadly pesticides kill indiscriminately. They not only affect “pest” insects, but countless butterflies and other wildlife. They have been linked to loss of birds, the collapse of fisheries and birth defects in white-tailed deer.

Neonics are also used prophylactically, which means they’re used whether they’re needed or not. Most applications covering hundreds of millions of acres are treating pest problems that don’t exist and they and make it even worse by killing off beneficial bugs and soil microbes that promote crop health and production.

What about human health?

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention note that half the US population is exposed to at least one type of neonicotinoid on a regular basis. They’re found in the food we eat and the water we drink, and chlorination doesn’t remove these pesticides from our tap water. Residues are found in 86 percent of US honey and many of the fruits that we consume. These toxins cannot be rinsed or peeled off. Other research links neonics to neurological harm in humans such as muscle tremors, lower testosterone levels, altered insulin regulation and change to fat metabolism. Peer-reviewed research has linked exposure to neonics while in the womb to birth defects such as deformations of the heart and brain.

What are we doing about it?
Neonicotinoids have been banned in the UK and Europe since 2018 and in selected areas of Canada. Some states such as Maryland, Maine, New York, New Jersey and California have restricted the use of these pesticides with New Jersey having the strongest and smartest restrictions in the country.

On June 22 of this year, Congressman Earl Blumenauer of Oregon introduced the Save America’s Pollinator’s Act (HR 4277) in the House Congress. The bill was referred to the Committee on Agriculture and also to the Committee on Natural Resources for a period to be determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions. As of September 2023, it remains in committee.

You can help
Only an outright ban by the Environmental Protection Agency will protect our pollinators, our ecosystem and our health from these dangerous pesticides. Find out what your state’s position is on neonicotinoids and tell your elected officials that they need to support a ban on these pesticides.

Colorado Article - States Ratification Difficulties
In August 1921, when the US Congress agreed that a compact be negotiated between the seven states with water rights to the Colorado River, it also stipulated the agreement would not be binding until each of those states ratified it. The Colorado River Compact (CRC), signed by its creators in late November 1922 could not go into effect even though the biggest and most powerful state, California, was more than anxious that a dam be built for flood control. The compact that had taken months to create ended up taking years to enact.
Ratification difficulties began with the three lower basin states – Arizona, California, and Nevada. California put the difficulties into motion by introducing legislation that would authorize immediate construction of a dam, a move that went directly against the CRC which called for ratification prior to building infrastructure on the river. California’s legislature made this move because it assumed Arizona would not ratify in time to implement measures to manage serious flooding.
Arizona’s legislature did, in fact, fail to ratify by one vote. Arizona was a young state, ten years old, and saw refusal as a way to protect itself from California’s bullying. California proceeded to make the situation worse with a surprise plan to build an aqueduct from the Colorado River to Los Angeles. Even though all the states but Arizona had ratified the CRC by March 1923, Congress would not authorize any construction while Arizona was uncommitted.
A six-state ratification plan was then proposed with the idea that Arizona could sign on when it was ready and with six states giving approval, Congress could be encouraged to appropriate the funds for building a dam. Four years later, no funds had come through, Utah had repealed its ratification, California had involved itself in an internal wrangle about whether to cooperate with Arizona’s reticence or use litigation to pressure that state’s signature, and Nevada objected to the six-state plan because hydroelectric power revenue distribution had not been settled. New Mexico and Wyoming favored the six-state plan. Colorado and Utah wanted to stick with the original decision that ratification required all seven states.
As if matters between the states were not complex enough, outside business interests and political opinions about what agencies should be in charge added to the numerous disputes. Next time, we will examine some of them before showing how agreement was reached to finally go ahead with the CRC.
Full Cost Accounting
Full-cost accounting refers to business planning that uses a broader range of issues than we usually see on financial reports.  Environmental full-cost accounting’ uses this method to focus on how operations affect the ‘triple bottom line’: social, environmental, and economic conditions.
It includes costs that are typically “externalized” or ignored, such as the indirect cost of pollution and their effects on human health, so they can be included with other business planning costs.

Here’s an example of how it’s used in the agriculture/food industry. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) uses a planning process called ‘
MARCH, which is short for ‘Methodology for valuing the Agriculture and the wider food system Related Costs of Health’.  MARCH uses a measurement called Wellbeing Valuation (WV), that places a money-based cost on impacts from the food system, such as heart disease, individual healthcare costs, and loss of worker productivity due to health factors. It also puts a money value on factors such as food insecurity and malnutrition.

Our society can benefit from the use of full-cost accounting by industries, particularly the energy industry.  It can help weigh the negative effects to our health and society of using fossil fuels, such as community disruptions, negative health effects, resource depletion and destruction, against these fuels’ more obvious benefits (such as a barrel of oil’s very high energy potential). This method could also show the opportunity cost of spending money on developing cleaner, safer renewable energies in place of continuing to build fossil fuel infrastructure for our energy future.
When planners focus on a wider range of factors, it results in a more realistic picture of how industry operations will affect our future. That can make full-cost accounting a valuable tool to lead us from the short-term attention span that exists in our economics today, into a more realistic picture of a company's bottom line that shows how what they do now will affect all of us farther down the road.

Join one of our groups
You're welcome to visit any team and sit in on their meetings. It's a great way to learn what they're working on and see which team you might prefer to participate in. Email one of the contacts below to join a meeting.

Facebook
 
Twitter
 
Youtube
 
Instagram
 
Website
 
Email
Sent to: _t.e.s.t_@example.com
Economic Democracy Advocates, 638 Spartanburg Hwy, Ste. 70-342, Hendersonville, NC 28792, United States
Don't want future emails?
Unsubscribe


Email Marketing by ActiveCampaign